PSV-106 WORKING WITH PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICIALS

by

PSV-106
WORKING WITH PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICIALS

Modified from a Waller County ARES training article
written by Christine Smith, N5CAS (sk)


Meeting the communications needs of “served” agencies is quite a challenge in today’s complex disaster/emergency relief arena. The number of emergency relief organizations and their increasingly sophisticated needs all compete for that scarce resource — the volunteer. As more of the population moves to disaster-prone areas and with less government funding available, more pressure is placed on agencies to use and sometimes abuse the volunteer sector for support of their missions. As a result, toes are sometimes stepped on and volunteer morale can be undermined.

This is why the ARRL’s formal relationships with served agencies are vitally important and are valuable to radio amateurs. They provide us with the opportunity to contribute in a meaningful way in support of our charter. Another substantial benefit is that these relationships lend legitimacy and credibility to Amateur Radio’s public service capability.

So What Should We Do?

The answer is not the same for every ARES unit everywhere. How we develop our relationships with served agencies depends upon many factors and these factors are not the same from state to state, county to county, city to city or even agency to agency. The best that can be done in this short discussion is to explore some of the approaches to our problems. In the end, the adaptation of solutions to problems of served agencies is up to agreements between the local Emergency Coordinator (EC) and the Emergency Manager (EM).


Two general approaches have developed over the years. Both have proven to be useful and both are in use right now.

1. Traditional Method: Potential served agencies are solicited by the EC. When relationships are developed, agreements are made and the ARES unit tries to serve them according to their needs during emergencies.

2. Emergency Management Method: Increasingly the ARES unit attaches itself to the local Emergency Management unit, a unit of government charged with allocating resources during all emergencies. During emergencies, the Emergency Manager, tells the ARES EC where communications support is most needed. The EC then makes all assignments to meet those needs.

We use the Emergency Management Method in District 14. Federal law stipulates that each county in the US has an Emergency Manager whose job it is to allocate resources during times of emergency. For example, if a tornado devastates a city, the county EM may call on the county Sheriff to provide officers to augment the city’s police services, may ask a neighboring county to provide additional EMTs and vehicles, may contract with a local heavy equipment contractor to supply bulldozers, cranes and other equipment for rescue operations and so on. The Emergency Manager has the statutory power and responsibility to coordinate these operations. The essential activity of this job is management of resources during emergencies. An ARES unit is a volunteer emergency communications resource.

The county Emergency Manager allocates the ARES unit’s communications abilities during emergencies just like any other important resource. That is, the EM tells the EC where communications links are most needed. The EC then does all the usual tasks such as assigning operators and equipment, making relief schedules, and so on.

This arrangement has several benefits:

  1. First, the person who best knows what is needed in the emergency and who has the statutory job to meet those needs, the Emergency Manager, decides to what overall task(s) the ARES unit is assigned. The EC does not have to decide, for example, that it is more important to serve the Red Cross than the Salvation Army during a particular incident.
  2. Second, the EC does not have to “beat the bushes” looking for agencies to serve. The ARES unit is simply a volunteer arm of Emergency Management and serves agencies as they are assigned by the Emergency Manager.
  3. Third, the ARES unit may be given a meeting place in the Emergency Operations Center, maintained under the Department of Emergency Management. Some ARES units have even been given a separate Emergency Communications Center, a room where ham radio and public service radio equipment is stored and operated. Some Emergency Managers have allocated funds in their budget to purchase ham radios and antennas to support the mission of their attached ARES groups. As trust and mutual respect develops, hams are sometimes given even greater responsibility. At least one EC has been made Deputy Director of Emergency Management, a volunteer position with even greater opportunity to serve the public in time of need.
  4. Finally, there is training. Attachment to Emergency Management opens doors to a huge opportunity for emergency training at the local, state and federal levels. The Emergency Manager can authorize enrollment in a number of training courses offered at the state or national level.


GENERAL PRINCIPLES

What things are necessary when serving agencies? There are some underlying principles.

  1. Everyone must know with whom they are dealing.
    1. It is important that Emergency Managers know who leads the ARES unit, our EC, and that all recruitment and utilization of operators is directed by the EC. EMs need to be aware of our local and general ARES policies, capabilities and, probably most importantly, our limitations in operators and equipment. They should also be aware of who our “boss” is in ARES – our District Emergency Coordinator (DEC), our Section Emergency Coordinator (SEC) and the role each plays in emergency response. We want to make them aware of policies such as message format, security of message transmission, Disaster Welfare Inquiries and other procedures that will affect the way you serve them.
    2. It is important that the EC know the policies and hierarchy of each agency we are serving. With whom will the EC interface in an emergency? Who are their bosses? What policies does that agency have in place that may impact how ARES serves them? What other volunteer communications units will serve them?
  2. Everyone must know what to expect. A detailed operations plan should be developed with a served agency that sets forth precisely what each organization’s expectations are during emergencies. ARES and agency officials must work jointly to establish protocols for mutual trust and respect.
  3. It is important not to exceed your abilities. A challenge ARES faces during every disaster is the number of agencies that demand communications support and the number of communicators they need. A local ARES unit only has so much to go around and it cannot possibly meet every agency’s needs. Our capabilities will be limited by responding volunteers so priorities must be established long before an event to best utilize available resources.

The ARRL maintains several formal Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with disaster and emergency response agencies including the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the National Weather Service (NWS), the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, the National Communications System and Associated Public Safety Communications Officers. However, these documents are merely a framework for possible cooperation at the local level. While they are designed to encourage mutual recognition, cooperation and coordination, they should not be interpreted as a commitment, an obligate or a mandate in any way that an ARES unit must serve a particular agency or meet all of its needs in an emergency. MOUs are “door openers,” to help us get our foot in the door — that is all. It is up to us to decide to pursue a local operational plan with an agency. That decision will be based on a number of factors including the local needs of the agency and the resources we have available to support those needs given that we may have other prioritized commitments as well.

Given the above, we should also be working for growth in our ARES program, making it a stronger, more valuable resource able to meet more of partner agencies’ local needs. There is a stream of new Technicians coming into the amateur service that would make ideal additions to an ARES roster. A stronger ARES means better ability to serve our communities and served agencies in times of need and a greater sense of pride for Amateur Radio by both amateurs and the public.

Competition

A problem that is cropping up in some parts of the country is that of “competition” with emerging amateur radio groups providing similar communications services outside of ARES. Some of these groups may feel that their local ARES doesn’t do the job or personalities conflict and egos get in the way so they set up shop for themselves working directly with agency officials and usurping ARES’ traditional role. Due to personality conflicts or unfulfilled expectations, some agencies have been receptive to their assistance. This undermines our role and the dependence our agencies place on us as mandated by the government.

There continues to be “RACES versus ARES” polarization in some areas. Some agencies, including at least one with statewide jurisdiction are forming their own auxiliary communications groups and recruiting their own hams – some from ARES ranks. In some states, the problem has been solved by making every ARES ham a RACES operator and vice versa. We need to work to find and provide the best services we can, to strive for the growth and enhancement of ARES members’ abilities and to make sure we present a “professional” face to potential “served” agencies. If we can make our program better than the next guy’s, the agencies will be more attracted to us.

We may need to set aside egos and personalities and seek out these other groups and take the initiative to try to establish rapport with them and to establish that “we’re all in this together,” for the good of the public and Amateur Radio. With good communications, mutual respect and understanding between us and the other groups, we should be able to coordinate our program’s missions with theirs to foster an efficient and effective Amateur Radio response overall.

That concludes tonight’s training. Are there any questions, comments or suggested additions to this material?

Thanks, this is (callsign) clear to net control.




Send corrections, modifications, updates or suggestions to k5prs@aol.com